Program Self-Assessment Survey - Alumni

Subject area: PSAS helps university programs carry out self-studies or program reviews. Published by Educational Testing Service.

 

Format: Self-report survey asking 50+ questions comprising 10 scales, rated from 1 (poor or disagree) to 4 (excellent or agree)

 

Implemented: PSAS was sent to all alumni graduating from NCU between 1996 and 2004 from all academic majors

 

Data summary: All academic majors/programs combined below for average ratings on each composite scale and each item. Norms include 5984 alumni from other US institutions.

SCALE ITEM NCU avg. US norms
Environment for Learning   3.1 3.1
  Humane environment, mutual respect between faculty & students 3.5 3.1
  Students support each other in meeting academic demands 3.1 3.3
  Members work together to achieve program goals 3.1 3.3
  Receptive to new ideas and ways of doing things 2.9 3.1
  Different scholarly points of view are encouraged 3.1 2.8
Scholarly Excellence   3.0 3.2
  Academically demanding 2.8 3.3
  Academically stimulating 3.0 3.1
  Intellectual environment 2.9 3.2
  Scholarly/professional competence of faculty 3.2 3.3
  Academic ability & preparation of students 2.9 3.0
Quality of Teaching   3.0 3.1
  Faculty members prepare carefully 3.2 3.3
  Appropriateness of grading procedures 3.0 3.0
  Appropriateness of teaching methods 3.0 3.1
  Useful faculty criticism of student work 3.0 3.3
  Faculty helpfulness with classwork 3.1 3.1
  Faculty awareness of new developments in field 2.9 3.1
Faculty Concern for Students   3.1 3.4
  Faculty genuinely interested in students' welfare & development 3.5 3.3
  Good communication between faculty & students re: needs & concerns 3.1 3.2
  Many opportunities outside classroom for faculty-student interaction 2.8 2.8
  Accessibility of faculty members 3.1 3.1
Curriculum   2.6 2.7
  Frequency of required course offerings 2.7 2.8
  Variety of advanced course offerings 2.2 2.6
  Depth in subject matter of advanced courses 2.4 2.8
  Flexibility of programs to meet needs of individual majors 2.8 2.6
  Opportunities to pursue individual projects 2.6 2.7
  Interaction between program & related programs on campus 2.6 2.5
Program Procedures   2.8 2.8
  Program actively helps graduates find employment/pursue study 2.4 2.4
  Helpfulness of career advising 2.5 2.5
  Agreement between degree requirements & stated objectives of program 3.2 3.1
  Clarity of degree requirements 3.3 3.2
  Opportunities for student participation in program decisions 2.1 2.1
  Relevance of degree requirements to students' anticipated work/further study 2.8 2.9
  Opportunities for formal student evaluation of courses & instructors 3.0 2.9
Available Resources   2.4 2.8
  Library holdings related to the field 2.1 2.8
  Labs, studios & equipment for teaching & creative work in the field 2.1 2.6
  Overall adequacy of space & other facilities for classes 7 administration 2.4 2.8
  Institution's commitment to the program 3.1 3.1
  Overall adequacy of financial resources in support of this program 2.4 2.6
  Number of support & clerical staff in program 2.2 2.6
  Quality of support & clerical staff 2.6 2.9
Alumni Satisfaction With Program   3.1 3.2
  I have learned a great deal as a major in this program 3.4 3.4
  I would advise a friend with similar interests to major in this program 3.3 3.3
  If I were starting over, I would enroll in this program again 3.0 3.1
  Program provides good preparation for future professional work/advanced study 2.9 3.1

Internship/Fieldwork/Clinical Experience

  3.1 3.1
  Program training to prepare you for the experience 2.9 3.0
  Contribution of the experience to your academic development 3.2 3.3
  Chance to develop your professional skills 3.3 3.3
Employment Assistance   2.1 2.3
  Helpfulness of program's formal or informal efforts in finding a job 2.1 2.1
  Helpfulness of assistance of individual professors in finding a job 2.4 2.5
  Helpfulness of the placement office in finding a job 1.7 1.8

 

 

For more information, contact the Assessment Coordinator